The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom Archives - Page 14 of 35

Two Traits of Watchtower Jesus

December 8, 2015 By Sean

I would like to take just a little time to see what the Watchtower said about Jesus. The organization throughout various points within it’s history has had conflicting teachings on who Jesus was. They settled on Michael in the 1920s with quotes such as:

But Jesus was a prince, the Son of God. In his prehuman condition his name was Michael. He created the angels and everything else in the universe, except God himself.

The Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Kingdom.. April 1, 1929 p. 109

This isn’t the only thing that has been subject to change. Jesus, while on earth had his appearance change as well. I would like to start by covering the beard of Jesus.

The word “boldness” here used means frankness, bluntness, speaking freely and with confidence, outspokenness. This proves what kind of man Jesus was, of whom the apostles learned. It also proves that Jesus was, of whom the apostles learned. It also proves that Jesus has been grossly misrepresented by others. Grace was poured upon Jesus’ lips. But that did not mean that he had to rub his hands together, pull his beard, and look down when he spoke to somebody else. Jesus was straightforward.

The Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Kingdom. July 15, 1927 p. 214, 215

Grace is used in the above quote and you as a Watchtowerite knows the New World Translation equivalent: Undeserved kindness.

This spurred a question: Are you as a Watchtowerite straightforward when you are in field service telling the people why you are knocking on their door?

The traditional picture of Jesus shows him with long hair and beard, but the Watch Tower publications illustrate him as beardless and with short hair. Which is correct?—M. H., United States.

The later Watch Tower publications show Jesus as beardless and with short hair because he is shown that way in representations of him that are older than the traditional effeminate-looking picture.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. August 15, 1954 p. 511

When Jesus Christ was a man on earth, did he wear a beard?—K.A., U.S.A.

Biblical evidence is the most reliable testimony to be found on this question, and a recent careful review of what it says indicates that Jesus did indeed have a beard.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. May 1, 1968 p. 286

Here are some considerations:

Depictions throughout the history of Christendom whether it be the Eastern which is the Eastern Orthodox church or Western Christianity of which the umbrella includes Catholicism, Protestants, and Evangelicals predominately depict the adult Jesus with a beard. There are all according to the organization under the control of Satan. However, these groups under Satan’s control have shown that they had it correct all along.

The organization said Biblical evidence is the most reliable testimony. Here’s some verses from the New World Translation:

Galatians 4:4 (NWT)-But when the full limit of the time arrived, God sent his Son, who was born of a woman, and who was under the law,
- Galatians was written in the year 56 A.D.
Leviticus 19:27 (NWT)-You must not shave the hair on the side of your head or disfigure the edges of your beard.
Leviticus was written between 1440 and 1400 B.C.
Isaiah 50:6 (NWT)-Prophetic passage that says (NWT): I offered my back to those striking me And my cheeks to those who plucked them bare. I did not hide my face from humiliating things and from spit.
Isaiah was written between 701 and 681 B.C.
- Dates are provided by www.gotquestions.org.

Now, I will never call myself a biblical scholar at all however, the organization didn’t read any of those verses that I just quickly did. After reading through those verses it should have been plainly evident.

Now that the Watchtower is finally right on Jesus having a beard, let’s talk about something I came across recently, what happened to the body of Jesus?

Our Lord’s human body, the one crucified, was removed from the tomb by the power of God. Had it remained there it would have been an obstacle in the way of the faith of his disciples, who were not yet instructed in spiritual things. They were not thus instructed until the giving of the holy spirit at Pentecost. The scriptures do not reveal what became of that body, except that it did not decay or corrupt. (Acts 2:27-31) We can only surmise that the Lord may have preserved it somewhere to exhibit to the people of the millennial age.

The Harp of God. 1921, 1928 ed. p. 172

Here he was crucified and not impaled because again, the New World Translation didn’t exist.

What happened to the perfect fleshly body of Jesus after his death? Was it preserved so that in time men will look upon it in worship? or does Jesus still have this fleshly body in the heavens, “spiritualized” so that it can be seen and worshiped? Neither. The Scriptures answer: It was disposed of by Jehovah God, dissolved into its constituent elements or atoms.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. September 1, 1953 p. 518

If the body would remain, there would be visible creature worship.

This is the last time that the organization used the term “disposed” in literature however the concept still remains and is reinforced with the following:

Well, then, what happened to Jesus’ fleshly body? Did not the disciples find his tomb empty? They did, because God removed Jesus’ body. Why did God do this? It fulfilled what had been written in the Bible. (Psalm 16:10; Acts 2:31)

You Can Live Forever in Paradise on Earth. 1982, 1989 ed. p. 144

So let’s analyze this section:

Jesus would have to have two separate bodies. One to be displayed and the other body is to be inhabited. Most likely, the invisible body would be the spiritual one. The organization talks so much about Jehovah yet only Jesus is that is to be on display. Why is that? Has the organization contradicted the very words within the New World Translation?

I say this because a common thread for people involved with organizations similar to the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society deny of the visible bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ.

What happened to Jesus’ body: Since the organization said that scripture is the authority, why do they plainly miss the following verses from John 2:19-21 (NWT) 19. Jesus replied to them: “Tear down this temple, and in three days I will raise it up. 20. The Jews then said: “This temple was built in 46 years, and will you raise it up in three days?” 21. But he was talking about the temple of his body.

One more verse and I’ll be done. This is a post resurrection account of Jesus recorded in Luke 24:37-39 (NWT)-But because they were terrified and frightened, they imagined that they were seeing a spirit. So he said to them: “Why are you troubled, and why have doubts come up in your hearts? See my hands and my feet, that it is I myself; touch me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones just as you see that I have.”

Are you going to place down the Watchtower material and read the Bible? When you do, you too will be thankful for the simplicity that God has offered.

The Truth-Delivered by Jehovah or a Conglomeration of Men?

December 1, 2015 By Sean

The title is a loaded question and I know it, however, I will back it up with verifiable information.

Taken from the July 1879 issue of Zion’s Watchtower and Herald of Christ’s Presence Reprints p. 8, 9:

“A truth presented by Satan himself is just as true as a truth stated by God.

Perhaps no class of people are more apt to overlook this fact than the Christian. How often do they in controversy overlook and ignore truth presented by their opponents. This is particularly the case when arguing with an infidel. They feel at perfect liberty to dispute everything he says on religious subjects. This is not the correct principle. Many infidels are honest–as anxious to speak and believe the truth as are Christians–and if in converse with them we ignore truths which they may advance, we not only fail to convince them of our truths, but put an end to all hope of reaching them; for our failure to admit the evident truth which they advance begets in them contempt for the one who is not honest enough to admit one truth because he does not see how it can be reconciled to another. Accept truth wherever you find it, no matter what it contradicts, and rely for ability to afterwards harmonize it with others upon “The Spirit of truth, which shall guide you into all truth,” as Jesus promised.

Is everything harmonized or just elements of it?

Today, I’d like to look at where the Watchtower goes in search of those who “make the truth true.”

What I will simply do is go over a list of resources and some background information about the author(s) and/or specific quotes on the material that was produced. Take special note of the material when it was published and if they had any connection with the Society.

Protestant and Catholic

Edmond de Presseznsé-The Early Years of Christianity. 1879

Robert Jamieson, A. R. Fausset and David Brown. A Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments. 1873

William Carey. An Enquiry Into the Obligations of Christians to Use Means for the Conversion of the Heathens. 1729

Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer. Critical and Exegetical Hand-book to the Gospel of John. 1884.

Exegetical Hand-Book to the Gospel of Matthew. 1880.

Alfred Edersheim. The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah. 1906. Jewish convert to Christianity.

J.E. Hunther. Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the General Epistles of James, Peter, John, and Jude. 1887

B. F. Westcott and F. J. A. Hort. 1881. Used for the basis of the Greek side of the Kingdom Interlinear Translation. Christianity Today

Antoine Augustin Calmet. James Bruce’s Dictionary of The Holy Bible. 1832. Antoine died in 1757 and was a Catholic. How many times has the Society gone after the Catholic Church even though it bears much in common?

The Catholic Encyclopedia-the organization has used this numerous times.

Ernst Wilhelm Hengstenberg. Christology of the Old Testament. 1839. died in 1869.

John H. Newman. Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine. 1881 edition. A Catholic cardinal

William Dool Killen. The Ancient Church. 1859. Irish Presbyterian minister.

James Hastings. The Dictionary of the Apostolic Church. 1916. Scottish Presbyterian minister and biblical scholar

Patrick Fairbairn. The Imperial Bible-Dictionary. 1874. Scottish minister and theologian

Adventists

Bible Readings for the Home Circle. A Topical Study of the Bible, Systematically

Arranged for Home and Private Study. 1920 edition.

Similar to:

If the six volumes of SCRIPTURE STUDIES are practically the Bible topically arranged, with Bible proof-texts given, we might not improperly name the volumes– the Bible in an arranged form.

The Watch Tower and Herald of Christ’s Presence. September 15, 1910. Reprints page 4685

Christadelphian

Benjamin Wilson. The Emphatic Diaglott. 1808

Eastern Orthodox

Cyril Lucar or Lucaris. Confession of Faith. 1629

Unitarian: Alvin Lamson

Michael Severtus: In 1538 Servetus, as Villeneuve, got into trouble with the faculty of medicine, the Parlement of Paris, and the Inquisition for mixing astrology with medicine. Although he was acquitted by the Inquisition, the Parlement ruled that his published self-defense was to be confiscated and he was to desist from the practice of astrology.

http://uudb.org/articles/michaelservetus.html

Last I checked the organization officially condemned it with the following:

Astrology is based on falsehoods and is therefore detestable to the God of truth, Jehovah. (Psalm 31:5) For that reason, the Bible clearly condemns it and urges people to have nothing to do with it. At Deuteronomy 18:10-12, God clearly states: “There should not be found in you . . . anyone who looks for omens or a sorcerer, . . . anyone who consults a spirit medium or a professional foreteller of events or anyone who inquires of the dead. For everybody doing these things is something detestable to Jehovah.”

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. June 1, 2010 p. 20, 21

However, they embrace him and regard him as one to look up to him even though he engaged in this practice.

Occult

It comes as no surprise that one Johannes Greber, a former Catholic clergyman, has become a spiritualist and has published the book entitled “Communication with the Spirit World, Its laws and Its Purpose.” (1932, Macoy Publishing Company, New York) In its Foreword he makes the typical misstatement: “The most significant spiritualistic book is the Bible; for its principal contents hinge upon the messages of the beyond to those existing in the present.”

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. October 1, 1955 p. 603

Says Johannes Greber in the introduction of his translation of The New Testament, copyrighted in 1937: “I myself was a Catholic priest, and until I was forty-eight years old had never as much as believed in the possibility of communicating with the world of God’s spirits. The day came, however, when I involuntarily took my first step toward such communication, and experienced things that shook me to the depths of my soul. . . . My experiences are related in a book that has appeared in both German and English and bears the title, Communication with the Spirit-World: Its Laws and Its Purpose.” (Page 15, ¶ 2, 3) In keeping with his Roman Catholic extraction Greber’s translation is bound with a gold-leaf cross on its stiff front cover. In the Foreword of his aforementioned book ex-priest Greber says: “The most significant spiritualistic book is the Bible.” Under this impression Greber endeavors to make his New Testament translation read very spiritualistic.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom February 15, 1956 p. 110, 111

A translation by a former Roman Catholic priest, Johannes Greber (1937 ed.) renders the second appearance of the word “god” in the sentence as “a god.” And The Four Gospels—A New Translation, by Professor Charles Cutler Torrey (second ed., 1947), says: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God. and the Word was god. When he was in the beginning with God all things were created through him; without him came no created thing into being.” (John 1:1-3) Note that what the Word is said to be is spelled without a capital initial letter, namely, “god.”

Aid To Bible Understanding. 1971 p. 1669

Thus the translation by Johannes Greber (1937) renders these verses: “Tombs were laid open, and many bodies of those buried there were tossed upright. In this posture they projected from the graves and were seen by many who passed by the place on their way back to the city.”—Compare the New World Translation.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom October 15, 1975 p. 640

A report in the Bible, as translated by Johannes Greber, says that when Jesus died, “the earth quaked, and the rocks were shattered.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom April 15, 1976 p. 231

Why, in recent years, has The Watchtower not made use of the translation by the former Catholic priest, Johannes Greber?

This translation was used occasionally in support of renderings of Matthew 27:52, 53 and John 1:1, as given in the New World Translation and other authoritative Bible versions. But as indicated in a foreword to the 1980 edition of The New Testament by Johannes Greber, this translator relied on “God’s Spirit World” to clarify for him how he should translate difficult passages. It is stated: “His wife, a medium of God’s Spirit world was often instrumental in conveying the correct answers from God’s Messengers to Pastor Greber.” The Watchtower has deemed it improper to make use of a translation that has such a close rapport with spiritism. (Deuteronomy 18:10-12) The scholarship that forms the basis for the rendering of the above-cited texts in the New World Translation is sound and for this reason does not depend at all on Greber’s translation for authority. Nothing is lost, therefore, by ceasing to use his New Testament.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. April 1, 1983 p. 31

As you can see, this is just a small sampling of the material that the organization has quoted over the years.

Where would this organization be without the mix Christianity (the umbrella of Protestants, Catholics, Eastern Orthodox) and people involved in the occult? Would the Society even exist?

One quote from the book Babylon The Great Has Fallen, God’s Kingdom Rules. 1963: Because Great Babylon herself stands for the world empire of false religion with its priests clergymen, monks, nuns, astrologers, spiritists, sorcerers. p. 605, 606.

My question is this, why does this organization clearly align itself with Babylon the Great when it comes to producing material? This is evidenced by continually using Babylon the Great to cite material from. The book “Reasoning From the Scriptures” uses nothing but resources that those within the organization hates to prove that it is the one true organization. When all “false religion” as the society renders it is destroyed, does this mean the Society itself will fall?

This organization that calls itself “the truth” continually relies on Babylon the Great to try and gain credibility. Last I checked, this is not how it’s supposed to be.

Watchtower History Through Bible Translation

November 24, 2015 By Sean

I have been reading through the Golden Age 1926. I came across this statement on page 242 of the January 13 edition, “The Society issues Bibles or parts of Bibles in 572 languages” under the subheading, “Soviets Refuse Admission of Bible.”

This is telling in and of itself. The organization that we know today is known for publishing as it says, “Bible based publications.” Here it is the total opposite and only talked about the Bibles it has printed.

This site gives statistics on how many Bibles are in existence by language: Quora-How Many Languages is The Bible In?

From this page you will see that 2,900 languages of the 7,000 on the face of the planet have some portion of the Bible written in it’s language. That number is getting added to.

Let’s examine one group that is considered part of “Babylon the Great.” I heard a presentation from the Wycliffe Global Alliance and how they are working at getting more bibles into foreign lands. If memory serves me correctly, they first go for the gospel according to John, then move to the rest of the Greek Scriptures. From there, they cover the Hebrew Scriptures. The translation process for them requires years of training to gain mastery of the language.

The video below taken from the Annual Meeting of es in 2013 Part 4 of 7 has Geoffrey Jackson explaining information regarding translation techniques 2:25-3:35 mark.

Notice it’s English comprehension and computer skills needed as primary skills for translation.

This led me to searching the Society and seeing how many languages the New World Translation is printed in. Here’s one quote I found:

The Bible is the worlds most widely translated book-parts of it being available in over 2400 languages. Some languages have not just one translation but scores of them. If you have a choice in your language, you surly want to use the very best translation you can find.

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. May 1, 2008 p. 18

This can be possibly misleading. The causal Watchtower reader may possibly believe that the organization is responsible for producing a number of the Bibles.

However, let’s see what the New World Translation edition of 2013 on page 4 says:

Available in whole or in part in over 120 languages.

New World Translation. 2013 Edition. p. 4

Let’s contrast that with other publications.

For instance, The Watchtower, available in over 210 languages, explains Bible prophecy, increases our comprehension of deep spiritual truths, and motivates us to live by Bible principles. Awake! magazine, published in some 100 languages, broadens our knowledge of Jehovah’s creative works and shows us how to apply the Bible’s practical counsel. (Prov. 3:21-23; Rom. 1:20) The faithful slave provides Bible-based material in more than 680 languages!

The Watchtower Announcing Jehovah’s Kingdom. August 15, 2014. p. 4

So let’s do some analysis on the information above:

The Wycliffe Global Alliance that is part of “Babylon the Great,” puts forth a greater effort in bible translation since it produces 531 complete translations compared to the 120 of the Watchtower Society. The difference is approximately 411 languages.

Why doesn’t Jehovah give his blessing to his “one true organization” and have the Society with a greater output then this group (it’s just one that i’ve listed and there are most likely more)? The Wycliffe Group on their about page started in approximately 1942. The Watchtower Society was founded in 1879 and has a 63 year head start. The sole mission of this group is to produce a Bible in every language needing one by 2025. This is in great contrast to the organization that is supposed to be advancing the kingdom which had a definitive date of establishment in the days of Russell (1914) to now it is “soon” to be established.

In 1926, the organization primarily utilized the King James Version. It wasn’t until 1942 that the organization started to use the American Standard Version for in part because of the use of the word “Jehovah” used throughout the Hebrew Scriptures. As you may well know, the organization first released the complete New World Translation in 1961 after releasing it in part starting in 1950. Regardless, the primary bible used by the organization has seen a net decrease of 452 languages from the days of Rutherford until now.

The JW Library App has the King James and American Standard Version available in addition to the Kingdom Interlinear, Byington, and New World Translation available. Why not hand out one of those translations such as the King James Version? It has been translated into approximately 2,452 languages according to the site King James Bible Online.

I think it goes on to show without much explanation needed that the New World Translation of the Bible has been altered to fit their doctrines rather than conform their doctrines to that of the Bible. One easy example is Philippians 2:9 with the insertion of the word “other” that is no longer in brackets. Hence, the Society is at a disadvantage of getting Bibles into foreign lands.

Next, the Watchtower is written in over 210 languages. The New World Translation is written in 120. This means that the organization has 90 more languages available for reading the Watchtower Magazine compared to the New World Translation. If you as a Jehovah’s Witness are going to actually read the verses listed, how can you do so without a translation? Does this mean that there is an incomplete meal of “proper food at the proper time?” I merely ask the question, what does the organization place a priority on? The Awake! magazine has a slightly lesser importance given that it is printed in only 100 languages.

Perhaps with the organization printing less in regards to the Watchtower and Awake! magazines, they will reallocate some of the funds to Bible making (it’s a dream, yes I know).

With things like this in mind, what has caused the organization to go from speaking in reference to the languages the Bible has been printed in to focusing more on “bible related” material by the organization?

For all of the material that you place in door to door work, how often do you go and place a Bible as opposed to a Watchtower magazine?

By all means, place down that Watchtower and read the Bible. Learn who the Jesus of the Bible is and I will ask, would you consider walking away from this organization and accepting Jesus only? If this organization was truly worried about the eternal state of people, should it print more Bibles or more Watchtower related material?