JW Changes

Exploring Watchtower Bible & Tract Society Material

Categories

Who Is Jesus Part I

November 15, 2016 By Sean

The preface to the entire conversation was this by the custodian’s husband, “this is not an easy chapter.”  I’m like, “I know, but we will get through it without any arguing, yelling, hurt feelings.”  We laughed and got started.

The regular conductor wasn’t present.  He had a replacement who’s been here in the past.  The custodian’s husband though was here. 

The second paragraph is one that has a good statement.  “Yet, many are confused about who Jesus really was.”  The first passage to bring out (with Google’s help) was Matthew 16:13-16. Further on it says, “Jesus is God.” I believe I was trying to get baited into a discussion if Jesus is God.  I wasn’t biting and elected to move on.  Page 38 there is a caption that says the following, “at his baptism, Jesus the Messiah or Christ.”  I asked about this in relation to Luke 2:11.  The question was this Luke correct in saying Jesus was Christ or the publication where he had to wait until he was baptized?  So he asked me, “what is the purpose of baptism?”  Me, “it’s a public declaration.”  Him, “So he had to be approved publicly.”  Me, “if that’s what you think yes I can concur with you slightly.  However, when we look at the prophetic verses that foretold his arrival (Isaiah 9:6), prophecy was fulfilled, so yes he was the Christ at birth.” He concurred a little bit and I said let’s move on. 

The next major point that we dwelled upon was Colossians 1:15. 

They believe “firstborn” is to be taken literally.  So I wanted them to look at verse 18 as well since it’s the exact some word in English.  I asked (custodian’s husband saw where I was going), don’t we have a contradiction since there were people raised prior to Jesus in the Bible?  Naming off examples such as, Lazarus, Jarius’ daughter, Elisha and others helped to illuminate this.  Their response, “well they died, Jesus didn’t.”  So I went into talking about how firstborn can be a position of prominence.  Esau was the firstborn, yet he “sold” it to Jacob.  When we look at the tribes of Israel, compare Revelation 7:5-8 against what’s listed in Numbers 1 starting at verse five.  You will see names are out of order. 

My bible has a Hebrew and Greek dictionary present.  I went over in between them and read it out for them word for word (small print it has).  I got agreement (surface not sure if it was meant) from the custodian’s husband that he can see how it would be considered preeminence. 

From there, we looked at the inclusion of the word “other” in the New World Translation.  I wanted to look at it via the JW Library App.  That word is not included in the Greek.  I have a copy of the 1969 Kingdom Interlinear Translation (affectionally called the Purple Eater) and showed them from there as well.  I highlighted the newest New World Translation doesn’t even bracket the word.  This will lead the reader to believe that this was included in the original Greek.  I was able to have them think hypothetically without that word.  That would then mean that Jesus wasn’t created.  The custodian’s husband could see how that conclusion was drawn.  The other guy-not so much.  So then they said, that Jehovah created everything.  I had a verse in mind.  Isaiah 44:24 says “Jehovah acted alone.”  They tried to rationalize by saying Jehovah acted alone through Jesus to create all other things.  I said, let’s just look at the scripture and take it at face value.  We don’t have agreement.  Isaiah is saying it was Jehovah, Colossians is saying it’s Jesus.  I was now accused of semantics and told that I’m the one cherrypicking the Scriptures.  So he said, we’d have to look at all verses that deal with creation (I’m not sure that’s going to happen but I’m more than willing to do so). 

This lead to the next major point.  The organization from the days of Russell has relied upon John 14:28 as a bedrock principal for Jesus to not be considered God.  This is an example of “reading something that isn’t there” and focusing in on one specific time.  I asked in reference to cross references if they use them. New guy, “Yes” all the time.  So I said, “let’s take a look at where it crosses to.”  So we go off to Philippians 2:5-11.  So here’s some of the things I was able to emphasize.

Verse six-did not have to regard being legal with father has a problem because he already was equal. This is interesting considering Jesus in the mind of somebody who belongs to the watchtower, is a mere angel. This is also stark contrast to Isaiah chapter 14 where a created being had a quality in the heart and he was cast down.

Verse seven says he emptied himself.  Short he lord himself down to the level of humanity. Verse eight obviously he was obedient and I said death on a cross.  However airport and Jesus died

Verse nine-as a result of his obedience he had a name given above every name.  Similar to Colossians 1:15,  the New World Translation injects the word “other” when has no actual basis to be there. 

Verse 10 has every me bowing to a creative being short in heaven which is where the Father resides.

I'm explaining all this the new guy in short is sitting there with a very contemplative look on his face. He says, “it doesn’t make sense to me at all.” I believe he was never exposed to this information before. The custodian’s husband willingly listened and when I bring up examples, he actually explains it back to me so that's an awesome small victory).  The new guy after a few moments carwash out. He said there is no way Jesus is Almighty. There is no way it is impossible Jesus is God. That is an impossibility that the Bible does not even teach.  Given his reaction that there is some sort of an internal struggle going on at that time. What he didn't have come to mine is Hebrews 1:3. That says Jesus upholds all things by the word of his power if one uphold all things does it then mean he could be even considered as being almighty? 

With that we were pretty much done for the session.  I asked some questions about the “life force” as it’s a term I’ve not been exposed to outside of the Watchtower.  I tired to get them to explain this.  In essence, Michael became Jesus, became Michael.  I asked for an explanation as to how and they said, “it was a miracle.”  Interestingly, creative works were done with mere words.  However, they didn’t want to really explain and started asking questions.  I said it honestly doesn’t make sense.  From here, we talked a few minutes about just how the organization is set up.  Direct quote, “primary religious instruction comes from the Watchtower magazine.”  So we ended the session there.  Please pray that something would prick their hearts.

Filed Under: Bible Teach Study Tagged With: What Does The Bible Really Teach?, Jesus

What Is God’s Purpose for the Earth?

November 1, 2016 By Sean

My study conductor came he said at one point, “the organization has NEVER claimed inspiration.” He obviously has a very short memory or he was engaging and was engaging in the theocratic warfare tactic.  Here's the link that shows where the organization has said otherwise. In short, In a while for him to hide the truth from me. Also when I say “the truth,” It has another meaning. What they have is the truth, that means everybody else has a lie. This is another example of what it's called a “loaded language.” When it’s said, you may or may not pick up upon it however it speaks volumes within their mind.
I was also that's a sea organization is not inspired, when adjustments or correction is made they apologized for the mistake. I've read well over 10,000 pages of Watchtower material spanning the days of Pastor Russell to present day. I have yet to come across one explicit apology by this organization. If you can come across one, I would love for you to email me and let me know.

Paragraph eight speaks about the origin of Satan. What we have is a very quick introduction into his fall. Paragraph six talks about how he actually got his name. One thing that I was curious about was this quote, “He thus became a devil, which means slander. At the same time, he became Satan, which means ‘Opposer.’” I was able to bring in Isaiah 14:13-15 into this conversation. The publication implies by his action with Eve, he became the Devil. Isaiah implies it’s when his heart was built up.

On page 31, it implies that Satan has full reign and authority. From here, we see that Satan had to ask for permission to afflict job. Also, Luke 22:31-32, Satan has to again ask for permission. The question I ask is simply this, he has the capability to afflict but given that he must get permission, does this mean he has limited power? If Satan was truly the ruler of this domain, he would be able to act in any manner possible.
Towards the bottom of page 32, Armageddon has made it’s appearance. They will not tell you immediately is that the organization has predicted Armageddon to occur both in specific timeframes and years http://www.jwchanges.com/2016/02/15/when-is-armageddon/
Page 33, has an interesting quote on Isaiah 9:6, 7. The term “Eternal Father" has been left out.

Filed Under: Bible Teach Study Tagged With: What Does The Bible Really Teach?

The Bible A Book From God

October 18, 2016 By Sean

This chapter is one where on the 19th page, you'll see that it says, “the Bible has been published in 2600 languages and thus is available to more than 90% of the worlds population." What the organization has done though as it is slightly misleading in terms of how many Bibles it actually prints. If you take a look and the latest revision of New World translation, You will see on the credits page/Copyright page at the very beginning, Call Mark available in whole or in part in over 120 languages." So what we have is New World translation isn't 120 languages and all the other translations far exceed that.  The King James bible that the organization recognizes is printed in 2,454 languages: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/King-James-Bible-Anniversary/

 

My high school custodian then told me that there is virtually no difference between any Bible (some of the difference I highlighted in the chapter four interaction). Every single one of them pretty much reads the exact same way. I previously showed her a Bible translation chart. She was not aware of this. I talked her a little bit and told her about how Bible translations are either word for word or thought for thought. She was greatly amazed at this when I informed her about it.  A general observation, they forget things a lot or they choose to not bring something up.  When you want to look at something with them, you need to make a point to write it down for future reference. 

The next heading to harmonious and accurate. With this I would normally agree. However I've read through the New Testament portion of the New World translation. When you take that and you contrast that with other versus you'll see quickly that the New World Translation is not a very harmonious version of the Bible because our times where does contradict itself. This is true to an extent when you look at things through the Watchtower lens.

One thing at the Bible is not accurate in terms of their temptation is the fall of Jerusalem obviously this is true.  Speaking matter of factly, the Bible has a much better prophetic record than the organization does.  The organization on page 24 recommends that you read another book “A Book for All People.”  Groups that are like this will often self reference other publications that they have. The Mormons do this as well.  It’s a cultic tactic. Moving along what we have is this one case 26 and again I agree wholeheartedly with what. Paragraph 20 is also the truth.

 

Filed Under: Bible Teach Study Tagged With: What Does The Bible Really Teach?, King James Version

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 22
  • Next Page »

Contact Us